To clarify, I support computer modeling and laboratory research, but in a
program that is open to full disclosure and peer review, with strong social
science and humanities input.


On 9/26/10 11:45 AM, "James R. Fleming" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Our ignorance of a subject is a justification for not doing field experiments.
> Do what you like behind closed doors.
> 
> 
> On 9/26/10 10:59 AM, "Stephen Salter" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>    Hi All
>>  
>>  It is good to have the correct attributions to wise statements but the main
>> point of my reply to James was the attempt to get comments and help for small
>> experiments which he had said could not be done.  It is odd to say that our
>> ignorance of a subject is a justification for NOT doing research on it.
>>  
>>  Stephen
>>  
>> Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design
>> Institute for Energy Systems
>> School of Engineering
>> Mayfield Road
>> University of Edinburgh EH9  3JL
>> Scotland
>> Tel +44 131 650 5704
>> Mobile 07795 203 195
>> www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs <http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs>
>>  
>>  On 25/09/2010 22:17, James R. Fleming wrote:
>>>   Re: [geo] Fleming in Slate magazine (also others articles) Colleagues:
>>>  
>>>  Stephen Salter wrote: Ken has pointed out that we are already carrying out
>>> an dangerous planetary test which we do not understand.  Lowell says that we
>>> started it thousands of years ago.
>>>  
>>>  I believe the proper attribution for these ideas are not Caldeira and Wood
>>> but a combination of Glbert Plass and Roger Revelle and Hans Suess for the
>>> first and William Ruddiman for the second.
>>>  
>>>   
>>>>  "If at the end of this century, measurements show that the carbon dioxide
>>>> content of the atmosphere has risen appreciably and at the same time the
>>>> temperature has continued to rise throughout the world, it will be firmly
>>>> established that carbon dioxide is an important factor in causing climatic
>>>> change² -- Gilbert Plass (1956).
>>>>  
>>>>  "Human beings are now carrying out a large scale geophysical experiment of
>>>> a kind that could not have happened in the past nor be reproduced in the
>>>> future.  Within a few centuries we are returning to the atmosphere and
>>>> oceans the concentrated organic carbon stored in sedimentary rocks over
>>>> hundreds of millions of years.  This experiment, if adequately documented,
>>>> may yield a far-reaching insight into the processes determining weather and
>>>> climate² -- REvelle and Suess (1957).
>>>>  
>>>>  ³The hypothesis (Ruddiman, 2003
>>>> <http://courses.eas.ualberta.ca/eas457/Ruddiman2003.pdf>
>>>> <http://courses.eas.ualberta.ca/eas457/Ruddiman2003.pdf%3E> ) that early
>>>> agriculture caused large enough emissions of greenhouse gases millennia ago
>>>> to offset a natural climatic cooling remains controversial² -- Ruddiman.
>>>>   
>>>  
>>>  Also, there is no doubt that clouds can be brightened (by ships tracks,
>>> etc.), but is this a climate test? Do you know that in 1947 Kathleen Blodget
>>> at General Electric told Irving Langmiur that intervening in a cloud was
>>> something much different than ³controlling the weather?²  Seems to have
>>> fallen on Langmuir¹s deaf ears.
>>>  
>>>  Jim Fleming --
>>>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "geoengineering" group.
>>>  To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>>  For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
>>>  
>>  
>> 
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> 
>> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to