This may be a distinction without a difference, but there is no
long-term commitment to SRM once begun. Within a few years, the added
aerosols will be out of the atmosphere.

The long-term commitment comes from the long atmospheric lifetime of
the CO2 concentration perturbation. Thus, the commitment to
intergenerational transfer of risk seems to be a result of the CO2
emission, not the stratospheric aerosols.

Given some specified future CO2 emissions trajectory, would future
generations prefer us to keep the Earth cool or let it get warm? In
either case, we are handing them a perturbed climate system. I do not
think we can answer a priori which action on our part future
generations are more likely to prefer. In either case, we are handing
future generations an "unnatural" state of affairs.

I would assume that future generations would prefer us to hand them a
world with "natural" levels of atmospheric CO2 and planetary
temperature. However, if CO2 levels are high, the question of whether
they would prefer a hot world without stratospheric aerosols or a cool
world with stratospheric aerosols cannot be answered with armchair
philosophizing. We need scientific research to help evaluate the risks
of each course of action.


___________________________________________________
Ken Caldeira

Carnegie Institution Dept of Global Ecology
260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
+1 650 704 7212 [email protected]
http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralabĀ  @kencaldeira



On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Michael Hayes <[email protected]> wrote:
> One last thought, Wil.
> Don't bet on rare combinations! Casinos make Lots of money of those.....for
> a reason!
> Michael
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to