Hi Stephen--I think there is a simpler explanation, and that is that the
planetary boundary layer is shallow due to the typical inversion, so CO2
tends to build up near the ground during the non-growing season. My guess is
that the late summer values also tend to be a bit lower than Mauna Loa due
to the CO2 being pulled out from a thinner layer (you see a much larger
seasonal variation in high latitude CO2 than at Mauna Loa).

Mike


On 6/4/12 6:30 AM, "Stephen Salter" <[email protected]> wrote:

>   Hi All
> 
> There are not many large coal-fired power stations in the Arctic and so
> the question arises about where this extra CO2 in the Arctic has come
> from.  One possibility is that it is the product of methane
> decomposition and would be in line with the report to this group from
> Greg Rau of 22 May.
> 
> We know that the atmosphere weighs about 5 E18 kilograms.  If we know
> the plan area represented by the observing stations and the decay rate
> of methane to CO2 we could get an approximate figure for the mass of
> methane causing the rise in CO2.  We could then compare this with the
> scary rate of methane increase reported by Semiletov and Shakhova.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> 
> Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design
> Institute for Energy Systems
> School of Engineering
> Mayfield Road
> University of Edinburgh EH9  3JL
> Scotland
> Tel +44 131 650 5704
> Mobile 07795 203 195
> www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs
> 
> 
> On 02/06/2012 17:41, Rau, Greg wrote:
>> Greenhouse gas levels pass symbolic 400ppm CO2 milestone
>> Monitoring stations in the Arctic detect record levels of carbon dioxide,
>> higher than ever above 'safe' 350ppm mark
>> Associated Press
>> guardian.co.uk, Friday 1 June 2012 07.50 EDT
>> 
>> The Arctic Ocean with leads and cracks in the ice cover of north of Alaska.
>> Photograph: Courtesy Eric Kort/Jet Propulsion Laboratory/NASA
>> The world's air has reached what scientists call a troubling new milestone
>> for carbon dioxide, the main global warming pollutant.
>> 
>> Monitoring stations across the Arctic this spring are measuring more than 400
>> parts per million of the heat-trapping gas in the atmosphere. The number
>> isn't quite a surprise, because it's been rising at an accelerating pace.
>> 
>> Years ago, it passed the 350ppm mark that many scientists say is the highest
>> safe level for carbon dioxide. It now stands globally at 395.
>> 
>> So far, only the Arctic has reached that 400 level, but the rest of the world
>> will follow soon.
>> 
>> "The fact that it's 400 is significant," said Jim Butler, the global
>> monitoring director at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's
>> Earth System Research Lab. "It's just a reminder to everybody that we haven't
>> fixed this, and we're still in trouble."
>> 
>> "The news today, that some stations have measured concentrations above 400ppm
>> in the atmosphere, is further evidence that the world's political leaders ­
>> with a few honourable exceptions ­ are failing catastrophically to address
>> the climate crisis," former vice president Al Gore, the highest-profile
>> campaigner against global warming, said in an email. "History will not
>> understand or forgive them."
>> 
>> Carbon dioxide is the chief greenhouse gas and stays in the atmosphere for
>> 100 years. Some carbon dioxide is natural, mainly from decomposing dead
>> plants and animals. Before the industrial age, levels were around 275 parts
>> per million.
>> 
>> For more than 60 years, readings have been in the 300s, except in urban
>> areas, where levels are skewed. The burning of fossil fuels, such as coal for
>> electricity and oil for gasoline, has caused the overwhelming bulk of the
>> man-made increase in carbon in the air, scientists say.
>> 
>> It's been at least 800,000 years ­ probably more ­ since Earth saw carbon
>> dioxide levels in the 400s, Butler and other climate scientists said.
>> 
>> Readings are coming in at 400 and higher all over the Arctic. They've been
>> recorded in Alaska, Greenland, Norway, Iceland and even Mongolia. But levels
>> change with the seasons and will drop a bit in the summer, when plants suck
>> up carbon dioxide, NOAA scientists said.
>> 
>> So the yearly average for those northern stations likely will be lower and so
>> will the global number.
>> 
>> "It's an important threshold," said the Carnegie Institution ecologist Chris
>> Field, a scientist who helps lead the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental
>> Panel on Climate Change. "It is an indication that we're in a different
>> world."
>> 
>> Ronald Prinn, an atmospheric sciences professor at the Massachusetts
>> Institute of Technology, said 400 is more a psychological milestone than a
>> scientific one. We think in hundreds, and "we're poking our heads above 400,"
>> he said.
>> 
>> Tans said the readings show how much the Earth's atmosphere and its climate
>> are being affected by humans. Global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil
>> fuels hit a record high of 34.8 billion tonnes in 2011, up 3.2%, the
>> International Energy Agency announced last week.
>> 
>> The agency said it's becoming unlikely that the world can achieve the
>> European goal of limiting global warming to just 2 degrees based on
>> increasing pollution and greenhouse gas levels.
>> 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to