As I understand it, this scenario excludes the interplay between games in
mitigation and games in geoengineering.

Present political debate around GE is highly affected by the interplay.
Indeed, it could be argued that this interplay is the central factor in
current debate.

The simplifying assumption used by the authors therefore applies only in a
decarbonised world, and is thus inapplicable to all near-term scenarios.

Therefore, a more realistic model is that of torture. For example, the UK
has a history of posturing against torture, whilst tacitly and deeply
co-operating with states that torture - in both the practice of torture and
the utilization of intelligence gained by torture.

We should expect similar double-standards from developed nations with an
active environmental lobby in the case of GE.

A
 On Feb 13, 2013 3:09 AM, "Ken Caldeira" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Kate Ricke, Juan Moreno-Cruz and I have a paper out today in Environmental
> Research Letters (attached).
>
> http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/1/014021/
> YouTube video at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZihgJbvABE
>
> Environmental Research Letters <http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/> Volume
> 8  <http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8>Number 
> 1<http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/1>
>
> Katharine L Ricke *et al* 2013 *Environ. Res. Lett.* *8* 014021
> doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014021<http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014021>
> Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude
> broad participation OPEN ACCESS
>
> Katharine L Ricke1, Juan B Moreno-Cruz2 and Ken Caldeira1
>
> *Abstract*
>
> Solar geoengineering is the deliberate reduction in the absorption of
> incoming solar radiation by the Earth's climate system with the aim of
> reducing impacts of anthropogenic climate change. Climate model simulations
> project a diversity of regional outcomes that vary with the amount of solar
> geoengineering deployed. It is unlikely that a single small actor could
> implement and sustain global-scale geoengineering that harms much of the
> world without intervention from harmed world powers. However, a
> sufficiently powerful international coalition might be able to deploy solar
> geoengineering. Here, we show that regional differences in climate outcomes
> create strategic incentives to form coalitions that are as small as
> possible, while still powerful enough to deploy solar geoengineering. The
> characteristics of coalitions to geoengineer climate are modeled using a
> 'global thermostat setting game' based on climate model results. Coalition
> members have incentives to exclude non-members that would prevent
> implementation of solar geoengineering at a level that is optimal for the
> existing coalition. These incentives differ markedly from those that
> dominate international politics of greenhouse-gas emissions reduction,
> where the central challenge is to compel free riders to participate.
>
> _______________
> Ken Caldeira
>
> Carnegie Institution for Science
> Dept of Global Ecology
> 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
> +1 650 704 7212 [email protected]
> http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab  @kencaldeira
>
> *Caldeira Lab is hiring postdoctoral researchers.*
> *http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab/Caldeira_employment.html*
>
> Our YouTube videos<http://www.youtube.com/user/CarnegieGlobEcology/videos>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to