Wow, that's quite the steaming bucket of conspiracy theories. I'm almost disappointed that Area 51 didn't make an appearance.
Does anyone here know how widespread are the world views expressed in Warkentin's description? Is this a slightly disturbing nano-fringe, or is it large enough to have a non-trivial probability of influencing public policy? On Monday, May 6, 2013 3:47:43 AM UTC-4, andrewjlockley wrote: > > Poster's note : see bottom of below piece for info on rally. Suggest that > any well known researchers avoid the area. May be worth asking police to > attend. I would advise searching audience for concealed arms before > allowing entry. > > > http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2013-05-03/article/41048?headline=Hack-the-Sky---Vivian-Warkentin > > Public Comment > > New: Hack the Sky? > > Vivian Warkentin > Sunday May 05, 2013 - 05:54:00 PM > > On May 9th, 7:00PM at the Brower Center, 2150 Allston way in Berkeley, > corporate, billionaire- backed geoengineer, Ken Caldiera will be laying out > the scientists' plans to mitigate global warming by blocking sunlight from > the earth with chemical jet aerosols, such as sulphur dioxide and aluminum > oxide dust. Earth Island Institute, the sponsor of this debate, is calling > the event, "Hack the Sky?" An ethicist, not a scientist, has been chosen to > debate Caldiera. Is the Earth Island Institute telling us there are no > scientific arguments against this scheme? Arguments like: These chemical > dusts will fall to earth to be absorbed and breathed by humans and all > living things. The sun gives the earth life. Sunlight is necessary for > plants to perform photosynthesis which takes carbon out of the atmosphere. > The sun is the source of vitamin D required for human health. I for one, > would like to hear from some forestry scientists, soil scientists, ocean > scientists, biologists, botanists, entomologists, and non corporate > atmospheric scientists. It is time for those who truly care about the > environment to question blind trust in scientists and for that matter > established environmental organizations. Science at our Universities is > sponsored and directed by corporations now. Corporations have discovered > that the best way to control environmentalists is to fund them. It seems > that the "neo" environmentalists are running the environmental wing of the > global war on terror, scaring us into all sorts of banker, developer, > corporation, scientist enriching schemes ala "disaster capitalism". I know > there are plenty of well meaning caring people working with these groups, > but has fear numbed their critical thinking? Geoengineering is massive > pollution of the earth and it's inhabitants, and nothing less than the > corporate scientific takeover of our greatest commons, our sky and > atmosphere, natural weather and climate. It needs to be noted that the > description of geoengineering matches what many already regularly observe > in our skies. Please show up for this discussion on a subject that has been > mostly hidden from the public. There will be an educational rally and march > opposing geoengineering beginning at 6:00pm corner of Oxford and University. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
