Excuse my ignorance - AGU? EGU?
What I do know is that people very often omit any discussion of ARW in
their papers, reviews, etc, on CO2 drawdown. And that it is entirely
absent from the policy debate. Probably because it comes in at a tenth
of the cost, and zillionth the risk, of their preferred options.
Since ARW has been published quite widely, and is included in the Royal
Society's review of geoengineering, it is hard to see the omission as
accidental.
Oliver.
On 08/06/2013 04:35, Russell Seitz wrote:
Instead of adding yet another interest group to the crowded scene,
many of the aims discussed here could be accomplished by established
by creating new sections within the the AGU and EGU, automatically
qualifying them for a place at those organizations'policy discussion
table,
As can be seen from the absence of SRM from the agenda AGU's
forthcoming ( June 24-26) science policy conference in Washington ,
the absence of such sections from the scene is already consequential.
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:26:18 AM UTC-4, Oliver Tickell wrote:
There has been sod all funding for studies of accelerated rock
weathering. Some work has been done, on farmland in Holland for
example,
but to get this wiely accepted it's important to know how fast ground
olivine weathers in different grain sizes, on land, on coast,
different
climates, effects on rivers draining olivined catchments, effects on
marine biota from washout of Fe (if any) / H4SiO4, usefulness as
fertiliser to restore Mg where lacking in soils, etc etc.
All of which really should be done before any large scale deployment.
Oliver.
On 05/06/2013 10:58, Andrew Lockley wrote:
>
> Where do people think extra money is needed to further the study of
> geoengineering?
>
> A
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it, send
> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<javascript:>.
> Visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
<http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
