Hi, thanks for this. Very useful.
The Sea ice outlook is also offered on the Arcus website 
http://www.arcus.org/search/seaiceoutlook/2013/june
Interesting that the Met Office is the lowest projection.
Best wishes,
Emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Neumann <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:35:01 
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: [geo] Prediction: Arctic sea ice will vanish in 2013

Article published June 10 2013 on Sierra Club Canada website:

Why Arctic sea ice will vanish in 2013 by Paul Beckwith
http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/AdultDiscussionPlease

Not peer-reviewed science I know, but he's a Ph.D. student in climatology. 
The animation <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ljHI0VITgk> he made is 
somewhat alarming, showing how the ice speed is related to early thinning 
this season.

Quote from the article:

In previous years, when cyclones (low pressure storm systems) moved over 
sea ice, there was little noticeable effect. However, last August (2012) -- 
like a giant blender -- a massive cyclone invaded the Arctic Ocean basin 
and smashed around sea ice for roughly 8 days. In the end, a staggering 0.8 
million square kilometres of sea ice was lost (a roughly 20% reduction from 
the year before). By mid-September the icecap was at a record low volume 
(best illustrated in this YouTube 
video<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgiMBxaL19M> titled 
“Arctic sea ice minimum volumes 1979-2012”).
Within the last few weeks, cyclonic activity has returned and once again 
caused substantial thinning and weakening of the sea ice near the North 
Pole. Ice near the center of cyclonic activity, recently 2 to 2.5 metres 
thick (*light blue in my animation*), has thinned to roughly 1.25 metres (*dark 
blue in my animation*). This in less than 2 weeks: unprecedented so early 
in the melt season. More significantly, in the last few days a gaping 
“hole” has appeared in the much thicker ice just north of the Canadian 
Arctic Archipelago. Ice that was recently 3.5 to 4 metres thick (*yellow in 
my animation*) is now less than 2 metres thick in the *hole.
*The *hole *is likely due to a combination of divergence of the ice away 
from the rotating cyclone center, and the upwelling (churning up) of warm, 
salty sea water below. The most rapid melting and ice deterioration is 
occurring below the surface (where the cold surface air temperature can’t 
slow melting).
The magnitude of the most recent cyclonic activity is not unusual, although 
the persistence is. What is also new in the equation is the ability of 
these common cyclones to degrade the ice, and do so very early in the melt 
season. Also new is the substantial increase in amplitude, frequency and 
duration of cyclonic activity in the Arctic Ocean basin. The thinning ice 
cover not only breaks up easier now (even by relatively small and weak 
cyclones), more open water leads to an increase in melting and storm 
intensity.
It’s for all these reasons I find it extremely difficult to comprehend how 
any sea ice will be left after this year’s summer ‘melt season’. 


Clearly this is a minority viewpoint, and likely he is "crying wolf". 
 OTOH, chaotic systems can shift rapidly when you get near instability. 
 And in many fields, it's the young researchers who can see new phenomena 
that oldsters can't see.

Geoengineers get ready. Your moment in the spotlight is coming soon.

--ErikN


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to