Klaus Lackner and I tried to inject some hope and optimism into the earlier 
climate change mitigation discussion by Matthews and Solomon:
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6140/1522.2.full

M&S reply:
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6140/1523.1.full

They summarize:
"In a discussion of the potential for immediate or near-future action to slow 
the growth of atmospheric CO2, we suggest that consideration of carbon dioxide 
removal (or other geoengineering) technologies would at best be not very 
relevant, and at worst could distract from the imperative of decreasing 
investment in energy technologies that lead to large CO2 emissions."

Message to CRDer's: Put down those pencils and back away from the black board - 
you are distracting the geniuses who are going to reduce CO2 emissions and you 
are a potential menace to the planet. That goes double for SRMer's.

Greg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to