Salif,

my belief is that he suggests other avenues are far more sensible and that this 
avenue isn't one to seek a solution from, hence his: "We shouldn’t waste a lot 
of time talking about them. Some people will anyway, but they’re just crazy." 
Admittedly, it's quite full on, albeit similar sentiments have been echoed 
before by some of the world's most prominent scientists/policy researchers 
etc., e.g.:
"In delivering the prestigious Tyndall Lecture at the annual American 
Geophysical Union meeting last December, he said the idea of putting sulfate 
aerosols in the stratosphere was “barking mad.” Pierre­humbert also rejects the 
value of doing field experiments. “The whole idea of geoengineering is so crazy 
and would lead to such bad consequences, it really is pretty pointless. We 
already know enough about sulfate albedo engineering to know it would put the 
world in a really precarious state. Field experiments are really a dangerous 
step on the way to deployment, and I have a lot of doubts what would actually 
be learned.”"

It seems that Tim Palmer holds the belief that impressions will change a lot 
when models become better (although he doesn't use a comparable tone): "the 
nations of the world should come together to fund the sort of supercomputers 
that would allow us to simulate the climate of the coming century with much 
greater reliability than is currently possible.  The impact that this will have 
for mitigation, adaptation and geoengineering policies is likely to be 
enormous.", and so on.

Al Gore does discuss other things he think may bring about solutions though - 
just not involving SRM in any way.

And anyway, it seems quite obvious that there exists no necessary condition for 
a statement involving the pointing out of what an individual considers to be a 
major obvious issue/flaw to be coupled with a solution, no?

Simon

________________________________________________

Simon Driscoll
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics
Department of Physics
University of Oxford

Office: +44 (0) 1865 272930
Mobile: +44 (0) 7935314940

http://www2.physics.ox.ac.uk/contacts/people/driscoll
________________________________
From: Salif KONE [[email protected]]
Sent: 24 August 2013 15:19
To: Simon Driscoll; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering

I do disagree with this Al Gore' statement " ...We shouldn’t waste a lot of 
time talking about them. Some people will anyway, but they’re just crazy.". He 
exposes the problems without proposing a solution; Geo-engineering is trying to 
find a solutin through techniques as SRM...

****************************************************
Salif KONE,
M.Sc.Université Joseph Fourier/OSUG Grenoble/
                       UniversitéMontpellier II, 2007.
Enseignant à l’Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs
                  Abderrhamane Baba Touré (ENI-ABT)
Adresse: 410 Av. Van Vollenhoven BP.: 242, Bamako-Mali.
PhD Student(Oct. 2011- present), ISFRA-Bamako.
Tel.:+223 76 39 60 09 / +223 64 59 67 99
BP.:7048, Bamako-Mali.
Email:[email protected]

________________________________
De : Simon Driscoll <[email protected]>
À : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Envoyé le : Vendredi 23 août 2013 21h20
Objet : [geo] Al Gore on geoengineering

Al Gore: "Let me deal with the geoengineering part of your question first. 
That’s complex because there are some benign geoengineering proposals like 
white roofs or efforts to figure out a way to extract CO2 from the atmosphere , 
though no one has figured out how to do that yet. But the geoengineering 
options most often discussed, like putting sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere 
or orbiting tinfoil strips — these are simply nuts. We shouldn’t waste a lot of 
time talking about them. Some people will anyway, but they’re just crazy.

To the broader part of your question, innovation is already playing a major 
role in bringing about new potential solutions to the climate crisis. The tech 
world had a bitter experience after the burst of enthusiasm in 2005 and 2006 
because of a perfect storm made up of four elements: First, the great 
recession, which had a huge, destructive impact on business generally. Number 
two, the Chinese juggernaut, which subsidized the production of several 
prominent renewable energy technologies to the point where their sales price 
fell below the price of production in the West. Third, the shale gas boom 
dropped the retail price of electricity to levels below what many renewable 
energy plans needed to be viable. And fourth there was the policy failure I 
mentioned earlier in the U.S. Senate and Copenhagen. And all the while there 
was this massively funded climate denier campaign by the Koch Brothers and 
Exxon-Mobile and others that hired tobacco industry veterans to work with them 
on consumer advertising and lobbying activities.
But that setback was only temporary because reality has a way of reasserting 
itself. There has been a 100-fold increase in the number of extreme, 
high-temperature events around the world in the distribution curve. And people 
have noticed for themselves — the rain storms are bigger, the droughts are 
deeper and the fires are more destructive. All of these things have not escaped 
notice and people are connecting the dots. The cumulative amount of energy 
trapped by manmade global warming pollution each day in the earth’s atmosphere 
is now equal to the energy that would be released by 400,000 Hiroshima bombs 
going off every 24 hours. It’s a big planet, but that’s a lot of energy.
The consequences are now hard to escape. Every night on the news, it’s like a 
nature hike through the book of revelations. Eleven states today are fighting 
35 major fires! People are noticing this. And simultaneously they’re noticing 
the sharp drop in the cost of carbon-free, greenhouse gas-free energy, and the 
combination is pushing us over this political tipping point and the trend is 
unstoppable."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/08/21/al-gore-explains-why-hes-optimistic-about-stopping-global-warming/

________________________________________________

Simon Driscoll
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics
Department of Physics
University of Oxford

Office: +44 (0) 1865 272930
Mobile: +44 (0) 7935314940

http://www2.physics.ox.ac.uk/contacts/people/driscoll
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to