Hi all,

I work for GiveWell <http://www.givewell.org/>, a nonprofit that does
research to help donors decide where to give, and we're in the early stages
of considering recommending funding for geoengineering research. One
question we're interested in as we think about that is how much funding is
already directed to geoengineering research.

Andy Parker and David Keith have put together a helpful list of publicly
funded solar geoengineering research projects around the world, including
funding information:
http://environment.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/srm_projects_around_the_world.pdf
(linked
from here <http://environment.harvard.edu/geoengineering>).

In the interest of trying to get an estimate of the total global annual
funding for solar geoengineering research, I've added a few projects
(mostly US- and philanthropically-funded) to their list, added timing info
where I could find it, and uploaded it to Google Docs here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhzKnm3ez8kJdElmRmE3aFN4bTMtYl9lamo3SDlyM1E&usp=sharing

My total estimate comes out to around $10 million/year. Key (uncertain)
assumptions include:

   - Continued support from Bill Gates for
FICER<http://www.keith.seas.harvard.edu/FICER.html> at
   ~$1.5 million/year
   - 50% of SCRiM' <http://scrimhub.org/>s main NSF grant is devoted to
   geoengineering research. The grant is mentioned as a source of support
   for GeoMIP <http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/GeoMIP/support.html> but
   the 50% figure is pulled out of nowhere.

Programs I know of but don't have any funding info for include:

   - Finland's COOL<http://www.uef.fi/en/oikeustieteet/aerosol_intervention>
   - IASS' Investigation and Assessment of Geo-Engineering Approaches which
   influence the Composition of the
Atmosphere<http://www.iass-potsdam.de/de/forschungscluster/nachhaltige-interaktionen-mit-der-atmosphaere/climate-engineering/investigation>
   - Exeter's G360 <http://www.exeter.ac.uk/g360/>

*I've made *the
spreadsheet<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhzKnm3ez8kJdElmRmE3aFN4bTMtYl9lamo3SDlyM1E&usp=drive_web#gid=0>
* publicly editable, and I welcome any additions or corrections, *particularly
with respect to the above uncertainties. If you add information, some note
about the source would be much appreciated (e.g. "I, Jane Smith, work for
the program" or "here's the website with the info").

The additions I made--and, I believe, the underlying list compiled by Andy
and David--aimed to include projects that have an SRM component (at least),
and are explicitly framed as geoengineering. Including projects that are
only "relevant" to SRM or that focus exclusively on CDR, as the GAO's 2010
report <http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10903.pdf> did, would lead to
significantly larger funding estimates. However, it's not the case that
100% of the included funding is going towards SRM research; many of the
included projects also have CDR components.

Thanks,
Alexander

-- 
Alexander Berger
www.GiveWell.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to