My understanding is that the Carneige Institute has an effective research funding programme, and they are set up to take donations from US donors. Unfortunately, European donors cannot give yet in a tax efficient fashion, AFAIK.
I've always been able to direct enquiries to Irene, see cc. A Bill - thanks. I'm not aware of ongoing funding for the Russian experiments, but if you're aware of that, I'd be more than happy to incorporate it. Ron - my impression (partly based on the GAO report I pointed to in my previous email) is that there's considerably more funding for CDR research than SRM research in the status quo, especially when you get into specific approaches, which drives my focus on SRM research. If you have other info on that question, I'd love to hear it. I definitely am interested in the amount of private sector support for this kind of research. On the other questions (universities, research, policy, education), we're pretty flexible. We work with individuals who could conceivably support a variety of different approaches. Best, Alexander On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Ronal W. Larson <[email protected]>wrote: > Alexander cc list: > > Can you clarify whether you are inquiring about A) geoengineering > (both SRM and CD) or B) solar geoengineering. > > Also whether you are also interested in the amount of private sector > research funding that is going into A) and/or B). And is total funding or > R&D funding that is more critical? I assume you can only fund > non-profits. But what if there was shared funding with a University? > > And whether you could fund an umbrella non-profit organization that > only partially supports research (but is promoting a particular "geo" > approach). I.e. Is your interest only in funding research? If your > funding could be restricted by the recipient to R&D, would that be what you > want? (Other funding being on policy, education, etc) > > Ron > > On Oct 4, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Alexander Berger <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I work for GiveWell <http://www.givewell.org/>, a nonprofit that does > research to help donors decide where to give, and we're in the early stages > of considering recommending funding for geoengineering research. One > question we're interested in as we think about that is how much funding is > already directed to geoengineering research. > > Andy Parker and David Keith have put together a helpful list of publicly > funded solar geoengineering research projects around the world, including > funding information: > http://environment.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/srm_projects_around_the_world.pdf > (linked > from here <http://environment.harvard.edu/geoengineering>). > > In the interest of trying to get an estimate of the total global annual > funding for solar geoengineering research, I've added a few projects > (mostly US- and philanthropically-funded) to their list, added timing info > where I could find it, and uploaded it to Google Docs here: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhzKnm3ez8kJdElmRmE3aFN4bTMtYl9lamo3SDlyM1E&usp=sharing > > My total estimate comes out to around $10 million/year. Key (uncertain) > assumptions include: > > - Continued support from Bill Gates for > FICER<http://www.keith.seas.harvard.edu/FICER.html> at > ~$1.5 million/year > - 50% of SCRiM' <http://scrimhub.org/>s main NSF grant is devoted to > geoengineering research. The grant is mentioned as a source of support > for GeoMIP <http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/GeoMIP/support.html> but > the 50% figure is pulled out of nowhere. > > Programs I know of but don't have any funding info for include: > > - Finland's COOL<http://www.uef.fi/en/oikeustieteet/aerosol_intervention> > - IASS' Investigation and Assessment of Geo-Engineering Approaches > which influence the Composition of the > Atmosphere<http://www.iass-potsdam.de/de/forschungscluster/nachhaltige-interaktionen-mit-der-atmosphaere/climate-engineering/investigation> > - Exeter's G360 <http://www.exeter.ac.uk/g360/> > > *I've made *the > spreadsheet<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhzKnm3ez8kJdElmRmE3aFN4bTMtYl9lamo3SDlyM1E&usp=drive_web#gid=0> > * publicly editable, and I welcome any additions or corrections, *particularly > with respect to the above uncertainties. If you add information, some note > about the source would be much appreciated (e.g. "I, Jane Smith, work for > the program" or "here's the website with the info"). > > The additions I made--and, I believe, the underlying list compiled by Andy > and David--aimed to include projects that have an SRM component (at least), > and are explicitly framed as geoengineering. Including projects that are > only "relevant" to SRM or that focus exclusively on CDR, as the GAO's > 2010 report <http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10903.pdf> did, would lead to > significantly larger funding estimates. However, it's not the case that > 100% of the included funding is going towards SRM research; many of the > included projects also have CDR components. > > Thanks, > Alexander > > -- > Alexander Berger > www.GiveWell.org <http://www.givewell.org/> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
