To list:, cc Greg

        I like what I read about the productivity of the brown seaweed, but as 
Greg points out, there is nothing of a geoengineering character in this article 
(not read because it is behind a pay wall and doesn't seem pertinent to my 
interests).  Adding to Greg's short list, I would add biochar production (via 
pyrolysis, not gasification) as a possible better use of the seaweed (sizable 
output of useful CO, not CO2, simultaneous with H2 and char).  But also should 
be considered is HTC (Hydrothermal Carbonization) which welcomes a wet 
feedstock and produces almost no CO2 - yielding mainly (useful hot) H2O and a 
mostly carbon output.  This process yields a more labile product - but some 
swear it is good enough for serious sequestration.  There are an amazing number 
of ways to process biomass - but on this list,  I hope we emphasize production 
of recalcitrant forms of carbon.  This article does not.

        There is some good giant algae work going on in Australia - and not 
enough worldwide.

Ron


On Sep 16, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Rau, Greg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Add CCS or preferably AWL to get C negativity. Figure out a way to 
> cost-effectively harvest biomass and recycle nutrients, and you might have 
> something, pending rigorous analysis from our ethics experts.
> Greg
> Steam co-gasification of brown seaweed and land-based biomass
> 
> <image001.png>
> 
> <image002.gif>
> 
> DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.12.013
> 
> Get rights and content
> 
> 
> Highlights
> 
> *
> 
> Excellent self-catalytic effect was found in steam gasification of seaweed.
> 
> *
> 
> More gas was produced from seaweed than land-based biomass.
> 
> *
> 
> Addition of brown seaweed in land-based biomass promoted gasification rate.
> 
> 
> Abstract
> 
> Alkali and alkaline earth species in biomass have self-catalytic activity on 
> the steam gasification to produce hydrogen-rich gas. In this study, three 
> types of biomass, i.e., brown seaweed, Japanese cedar, apple branch 
> containing different concentrations of alkali and alkaline earth species, and 
> the mix of both of them were gasified with steam in a fixed-bed reactor under 
> atmospheric pressure. The effects of reaction temperature, steam amount and 
> mixing ratio in co-gasification on gas production yields were investigated.
> 
> The results showed that higher gas production yields (especially for H2 and 
> CO2) were obtained when the brown seaweed was used than the other two types 
> of biomass since the ash content in brown seaweed was much higher than in 
> land-based biomass and contained a large amount of alkali and alkaline earth 
> species.
> 
> The yield of hydrogen increased with an increase in the amount of steam, but 
> excessive steam use reduced the hydrogen production yield. From the 
> co-gasification experiments, the gas production yields (especially for H2 and 
> CO2) from the land-based biomass increased with the increase in brown seaweed 
> ratio, suggesting that the alkali and alkaline earth species in brown seaweed 
> acted as the catalysts to enhance the gasification of land-based biomass in 
> co-gasification process.
> 
> 
> Graphical abstract
> 
> <image003.jpg>
> 
> Keywords
> 
> Biomass; 
> 
> Steam gasification; 
> 
> Co-gasification; 
> 
> Seaweed; 
> 
> Alkali metals; 
> 
> Alkaline earth metals
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to