Hi, just a short clarification:

The main point of our study is not that CDR is useless, but that it is not effective enough to counteract business as usual CO2 emissions. Our results stress, once again, that there is no alternative to immediate emissions reduction - CDR can be deployed as a supplemental measure (and maybe it should), but it would not be effective enough to reverse severe changes caused by a delay in emissions reduction.

On alkalinity addition: How likely is it that we would be able to do this on a global scale? I could imagine that alkalinity addition might be a way to protect a coral reef, being deployed locally, but globally? I guess it would be much harder to do than atmospheric CDR and you would have to be very careful how much alkalinity you add and how often, to not further stress marine organisms? As far as I know, there are hardly any studies on this?

(By the way, our study is not only about ocean acidification, but also about warming and oxygen depletion.)

Best,

Sabine



On 08/08/15 12:50 am, Greg Rau wrote:
If the goal is to restore ocean chemistry, it would indeed seem inherently 
inefficient to do so via CO2 removal from air.  Better to remove excess CO2 
from the ocean by chemical, geochemical, or biological means (1), my favorite 
being alkalinity addition.
Secondly, according to the IPCC (2) and now UNEP (3),  RCP 2.6 scenarios cannot 
be achieved without CDR  -  in the UNEP estimate, 300 Gts CO2 worth by 2100. So 
while I don't think anyone is asking CDR to do all of the heavy lifting, it 
would appear that at least some CDR is essential to achieve RCP 2.6 and 
probably even less ambitious scenarios, depending on when/if we ever get 
serious about emissions reduction.  What then is the point of dissing CDR if 
emissions reduction alone isn't going to save the ocean and the planet either?

1) http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-5784-4_54
2) http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter06_FINAL.pdf
3) http://www.unep.org/emissionsgapreport2014/

Greg
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 8/3/15, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote:

  Subject: [geo] Long-term response of oceans to CO2 removal from the atmosphere
  To: "geoengineering" <[email protected]>
  Date: Monday, August 3, 2015, 1:02 PM
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2729.html Long-term response of oceans to CO2 removal from the
  atmosphere
Sabine Mathesius,1, 2,
  Matthias Hofmann,1,
  Ken Caldeira3,
  & Hans Joachim Schellnhuber1, 4,
Nature Climate Change (2015):
  doi:10.1038/nclimate2729
   Published online 03 August 2015
Abstract Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere has been
  proposed as
  a measure for mitigating global warming and ocean
  acidification. To
  assess the extent to which CDR might eliminate the
  long-term
  consequences of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in the marine
  environment,
  we simulate the effect of two massive CDR interventions with
  CO2
  extraction rates of 5 GtC yr−1 and 25 GtC yr−1,
  respectively, while
  CO2 emissions follow the extended RCP8.5 pathway. We falsify
  two
  hypotheses: the first being that CDR can restore
  pre-industrial
  conditions in the ocean by reducing the atmospheric CO2
  concentration
  back to its pre-industrial level, and the second being that
  high CO2
  emissions rates (RCP8.5) followed by CDR have long-term
  oceanic
  consequences that are similar to those of low emissions
  rates
  (RCP2.6). Focusing on pH, temperature and dissolved oxygen,
  we find
  that even after several centuries of CDR deployment, past
  CO2
  emissions would leave a substantial legacy in the marine
  environment.
--
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the
  Google Groups "geoengineering" group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
  from it, send an email to [email protected].
  To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
  Visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
  For more options, visit
  https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to