Anderson could maintain his stance as a voice for realism while adding his voice to those calling for research into all forms of geoengineering. He could compare the cost of reducing emissions to the current cost of removing them from the atmosphere, call for a vigorous program of further research, then state that it is still his opinion that civilization needs to urgently and fundamentally transform its social, economic, and political relations if it wants to continue to exist.
> Moral: Do not ignore or downplay potentially useful actions, especially if > you have the time and resources to carefully evaluate them. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Greg Rau <[email protected] <javascript:>> > *To:* Geoengineering <[email protected] <javascript:>> > *Sent:* Friday, November 11, 2016 4:50 PM > *Subject:* [geo] Negative Emissions: Arrows in the Quiver, Life > Preserver, and/or Moral Hazard? > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > . > > > http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6313/714.1 > > > GR: Disclaimer - I was a co-signer. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
