Greg et al., Some discussion time should be set aside on how to integrate as many technologies as plausible to side step the competitive nature of many of the exchanges we typically spend time on.
The issue should be which methods are the most adaptable to being coupled with other methods regardless if they are SRM, CDR, etc. Those that are the lest adaptable to coupling with others are, inherently, the most riskiest, on many levels. AWL, MCB, Biochar, marine biomass, Olivine, and others have some level of coupling capacity. Best regards, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
