Ben, Judging from the topical description of this University Center for Atmospheric Research recent work, in this model we do not find weight given to Sulfur's role in Polar Stratospheric Cloud creation and the resulting heat feedback.
http://www.sparc-climate.org/activities/polar-stratospheric-clouds/ The preliminary work on SAI is incomplete without giving weight to the sulfur induced polar stratospheric cloud genesis and the resulting thermal effects. What is of great value in this important work is being able to adjust dynamics at the regional level. That is worthy of applause! We need this tool to guide stratospheric injections using a new school of thought. Injection of wetted carbon for stratospheric dehydration and energy needs is reasonable due to short suspension times. Migration of particulates to polar regions is minimized. Heated and wetted C injected by a well electrically grounded stratospheric station will guide in significant upper electrical current flow into the tether. Electrically bridging the area between the lower Ionosphere and the tethered station does not need structure, just heated wetted carbon. It may be time that sulfur be replaced with wetted C. The marine microbial loop likes it; it the same substance as BlueBiochar intended for our crops, and it can be used electrically to run perpetual operations. Sulfur needs to retire from the field in favor of wetted C. There is more to this story at: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1422084827841365&substory_index=0&id=100001195830750 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
