Hi John,

Thanks for supporting our point!

The image you posted was of global mean temperature over LAND, which based 
on the analysis shown in Figure 9 of Canty et al. and as nicely shown in 
your figure, fell by about 0.5 C after the eruption of Pinatubo (actually, 
CRU4 shows a slightly larger drop in land T than the record from Berkeley 
Earth, but no need to split hairs).  As we showed in our paper, upon 
consideration of the influence on climate of changes in the strength of the 
thermohaline circulation, the portion of the Post-Pinatubo decline in 
global mean temperature over LAND is about 0.3C.

Of course, only about 30% of the surface of our precious Earth is covered 
by LAND.  The rest is covered by ocean, which has a much larger heat 
capacity than LAND.

Have a look at the BEG record of near surface, Global Mean Surface 
Temperature over LAND & WATER, and let us know what you find.

Cheers,

Ross
On Friday, December 1, 2017 at 7:04:56 PM UTC-5, jharte wrote:

>
>
> Looks like about 0.5 C to me.
>
> John Harte
> Professor of Ecosystem Sciences
> ERG/ESPM
> 310 Barrows Hall
> University of California
> Berkeley, CA 94720  USA
> [email protected] <javascript:>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to