Further 
discussion:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/08/08/this-climate-change-hack-would-reflect-more-sunlight-not-such-a-bright-idea-study-says/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ca7f63bc40ba




      From: Andrew Lockley <[email protected]>
 To: geoengineering <[email protected]> 
 Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 12:44 AM
 Subject: [geo] Estimating global agricultural effects of geoengineering using 
volcanic eruptions
   
Poster's note: can't read full paper but I'm interested to see how much 
adaptation it assumed 
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0417-3



Letter | Published: 08 August 2018
Estimating global agricultural effects of geoengineering using volcanic 
eruptions
   
   - Jonathan Proctor, 
   - Solomon Hsiang, 
   - […]
   - Wolfram Schlenker 
Nature (2018) | Download Citation
Abstract
Solar radiation management is increasingly considered to be an option for 
managing global temperatures1,2, yet the economic effects of ameliorating 
climatic changes by scattering sunlight back to space remain largely unknown3. 
Although solar radiation management may increase crop yields by reducing heat 
stress4, the effects of concomitant changes in available sunlight have never 
been empirically estimated. Here we use the volcanic eruptions that inspired 
modern solar radiation management proposals as natural experiments to provide 
the first estimates, to our knowledge, of how the stratospheric sulfate 
aerosols created by the eruptions of El Chichón and Mount Pinatubo altered the 
quantity and quality of global sunlight, and how these changes in sunlight 
affected global crop yields. We find that the sunlight-mediated effect of 
stratospheric sulfate aerosols on yields is negative for both C4 (maize) and C3 
(soy, rice and wheat) crops. Applying our yield model to a solar radiation 
management scenario based on stratospheric sulfate aerosols, we find that 
projected mid-twenty-first century damages due to scattering sunlight caused by 
solar radiation management are roughly equal in magnitude to benefits from 
cooling. This suggests that solar radiation management—if deployed using 
stratospheric sulfate aerosols similar to those emitted by the volcanic 
eruptions it seeks to mimic—would, on net, attenuate little of the global 
agricultural damage from climate change. Our approach could be extended to 
study the effects of solar radiation management on other global systems, such 
as human health or ecosystem function.
Access options
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to