This is a great study to understand the effectiveness per unit mass *in the stratosphere*. Also keep in mind that there’s an additional factor, that at lower altitudes it takes higher injection rates to achieve the same burden in the stratosphere (i.e., lower lifetime at lower injected altitude).
If the only thing you cared about was cost, then since there are existing studies demonstrating that you can design an aircraft to get to ~20-21km, we roughly know that it could be done, but higher altitude injection means less total sulfur injected and hence smaller side effects, and should be better understood both on the modeling and implementation cost as the trade may well be worth it. doug From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Govindasamy Bala Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2019 9:38 PM To: Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> Cc: geoengineering <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [geo] Climate system response to stratospheric sulfate aerosols: sensitivity to altitude of aerosol layer Dear Andrew, Thanks for the posting. The heights studied were 16, 19 and 22 km, height that are relevant to solar radiation modification problem.. The final paragraph in the paper is worth reading to get more quantitative information from this modeling study. "To summarize, for the same mass, the efficiency (defined as changes in surface temperature per Tg S) of volcanic aerosol is less when it is prescribed at lower altitudes in the stratosphere (Fig. 9). For example, in our simulations, there is a surface cooling of 0.44K for each teragram of sulfur placed in the stratosphere at about 16 km altitude (100 hPa). There is an additional surface cooling of 0.15K per Tg S when the prescribed altitude is increased from about 16 km to about 22 km (37 hPa)." On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 12:55 AM Andrew Lockley <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Poster's note : this has significant implications for the engineering of delivery systems. I can't do the pressure altitude conversion in my head, but it's a lot higher than what's generally been planned for. We're gonna need a bigger boat. https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/10/885/2019/ Climate system response to stratospheric sulfate aerosols: sensitivity to altitude of aerosol layer Krishna-Pillai Sukumara-Pillai Krishnamohan et al. Received: 01 May 2019 – Discussion started: 23 May 2019 – Revised: 24 Oct 2019 – Accepted: 08 Nov 2019 – Published: 13 Dec 2019 Abstract top<https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/10/885/2019/#top> Reduction of surface temperatures of the planet by injecting sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere has been suggested as an option to reduce the amount of human-induced climate warming. Several previous studies have shown that for a specified amount of injection, aerosols injected at a higher altitude in the stratosphere would produce more cooling because aerosol sedimentation would take longer. In this study, we isolate and assess the sensitivity of stratospheric aerosol radiative forcing and the resulting climate change to the altitude of the aerosol layer. We study this by prescribing a specified amount of sulfate aerosols, of a size typical of what is produced by volcanoes, distributed uniformly at different levels in the stratosphere. We find that stratospheric sulfate aerosols are more effective in cooling climate when they reside higher in the stratosphere. We explain this sensitivity in terms of effective radiative forcing: volcanic aerosols heat the stratospheric layers where they reside, altering stratospheric water vapor content, tropospheric stability, and clouds, and consequently the effective radiative forcing. We show that the magnitude of the effective radiative forcing is larger when aerosols are prescribed at higher altitudes and the differences in radiative forcing due to fast adjustment processes can account for a substantial part of the dependence of the amount of cooling on aerosol altitude. These altitude effects would be additional to dependences on aerosol microphysics, transport, and sedimentation, which are outside the scope of this study. The cooling effectiveness of stratospheric sulfate aerosols likely increases with the altitude of the aerosol layer both because aerosols higher in the stratosphere have larger effective radiative forcing and because they have higher stratospheric residence time; these two effects are likely to be of comparable importance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-04wbNfg0E3q_8GtwXay88n_2r%2BhzYfVfrNPjq9SpJd9pg%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-04wbNfg0E3q_8GtwXay88n_2r%2BhzYfVfrNPjq9SpJd9pg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- With Best Wishes, ------------------------------------------------------------------- G. Bala Professor Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Indian Institute of Science Bangalore - 560 012 India Tel: +91 80 2293 3428; +91 80 2293 2505 Fax: +91 80 2360 0865; +91 80 2293 3425 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; bala.gov<http://bala.gov>@gmail.com<http://gmail.com> Web:http://dccc.iisc.ac.in/dr_govindasamy_bala_profile.html ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAD7fhV%3Dc5Q4XVod8rAide3VNOmN1uyPbp6B6TCRKij474F_Meg%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAD7fhV%3Dc5Q4XVod8rAide3VNOmN1uyPbp6B6TCRKij474F_Meg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/BN8PR04MB6130221DEC7DE8004718EECF8F560%40BN8PR04MB6130.namprd04.prod.outlook.com.
