https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/1739/2022/

Limitations of assuming internal mixing between different aerosol species:
a case study with sulfate geoengineering simulations

Daniele Visioni, Simone Tilmes, Charles Bardeen, Michael Mills, Douglas G.
MacMartin, Ben Kravitz and Jadwiga H. Richter


Abstract

Simulating the complex aerosol microphysical processes in a comprehensive
Earth system model can be very computationally intensive; therefore many
models utilize a modal approach, where aerosol size distributions are
represented by observation-derived lognormal functions, and internal mixing
between different aerosol species within an aerosol mode is often assumed.
This approach has been shown to yield satisfactory results across a large
array of applications, but there may be cases where the simplification in
this approach may produce some shortcomings. In this work we show specific
conditions under which the current approximations used in some modal
approaches might yield incorrect answers. Using results from the Community
Earth System Model v1 (CESM1) Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS)
project, we analyze the effects in the troposphere of a continuous
increasing load of sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere, with the aim of
counteracting the surface warming produced by non-mitigated increasing
greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations between 2020–2100. We show that the
simulated results pertaining to the evolution of sea salt and dust aerosols
in the upper troposphere are not realistic due to internal mixing
assumptions in the modal aerosol treatment, which in this case reduces the
size, and thus the settling velocities, of those particles and ultimately
changes their mixing ratio below the tropopause. The unnatural increase of
these aerosol species affects, in turn, the simulation of upper
tropospheric ice formation, resulting in an increase in ice clouds that is
not due to any meaningful physical mechanisms. While we show that this does
not significantly affect the overall results of the simulations, we point
to some areas where results should be interpreted with care in modeling
simulations using similar approximations: in particular, in the evolution
of upper tropospheric clouds when large amounts of sulfate are present in
the stratosphere, as after a large explosive volcanic eruption or in
similar stratospheric aerosol injection cases. Finally, we suggest that
this can be avoided if sulfate aerosols in the coarse mode, the predominant
species in these situations, are treated separately from other aerosol
species in the model.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAKSzgparejimPsCfr%2Bpx9U3%3DUOih4zKoBJ4HPj7WkWnAww5DDA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to