I might agree with Lomborg that geoengineering research “might just prove to be Earth’s best backup plan” if he meant it as a backup to aggressive mitigation and adaptation. But Lomborg has long called out mitigation as costly and unnecessary as he does again in this piece (and also, e.g. here <https://www.wsj.com/articles/climate-change-adaptation-panic-exaggerating-disaster-11634760376> )
So I remain entirely comfortable continuing to disagree with him. Peter Frumhoff From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Alan Robock ? Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 2:32 PM To: [email protected]; geoengineering <[email protected]> Cc: Stephen Salter <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [geo] An outside-the-box plan to fight climate change - Opinion - Chinadaily.com.cn That's not exactly right. What he wrote is: "We should not commence geo-engineering now, since the technology is not ready and we don't yet know enough about it. But we simply cannot afford to not research it. It might just prove to be Earth's best backup plan." I think we all agree with this. I debated him once on CNN. It feels uncomfortable to agree with him. Alan Alan Robock, Distinguished Professor Chair-Elect, AGU College of Fellows Associate Editor, Reviews of Geophysics Department of Environmental Sciences Phone: +1-848-932-5751 Rutgers University E-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 14 College Farm Road http://people.envsci.rutgers.edu/robock New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551 ☮ https://twitter.com/AlanRobock On 2/24/2022 2:26 PM, Renaud de RICHTER wrote: Both SAI and MCB got a strong supporter: Bjorn Lomborg http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202202/12/WS620712e7a310cdd39bc8634f.html?mc_cid=3dc934fe46 <http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202202/12/WS620712e7a310cdd39bc8634f.html?mc_cid=3dc934fe46&mc_eid=2decfaafd5> &mc_eid=2decfaafd5 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHodn9_A6T_kjUzp42cpiX6ZDKcWmFtnR_LTztTA%2Bnopr-YkHQ%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHodn9_A6T_kjUzp42cpiX6ZDKcWmFtnR_LTztTA%2Bnopr-YkHQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> . To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/2fefaab0-1d24-9b8c-8e61-9e9f533b6ae2%40envsci.rutgers.edu <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/2fefaab0-1d24-9b8c-8e61-9e9f533b6ae2%40envsci.rutgers.edu?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/005b01d829b8%246faab790%244f0026b0%24%40gmail.com.
