Hi all, so some time ago Chris proposed to make some code reviews on GeoServer commits. I still like the idea a lot, and from my personal perspective, Crucible looks easy and nice, whilst the Google one seem kind of process heavy.
For reference: http://www.nabble.com/code-review-tools-td17153080.html Does anyone else have a preference? Can we start using some of these tools? I'm also wondering how these tools might shape our way to commit. Like, it seems to me they kind of go against a style of granular commits with a specific msg each, and more to a single commit that encompasses all the work needed to fix a bug or create a new feature? I personally like granular commits when building new features (whilst I prefer the second style for bug fixes), wondering if there is any way to group them so that you can still make up tight messages but submit a group of commits as a single review subject. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
