> > I saw no discussion. Looking at the diff it would seem this change > fixes a regression introduced during the NY sprint? (using > layer and their names instead of resources and their qualified names?) Right, I guess a chance to chime in would have been nice. Especially since a better fix might just be to have LayerInfoImpl.getName() call through to ResourceInfo.getPrefixedName() since we don't really allow the two to differ, and this probably will probably come up again in other places. > > Cheers > Andrea > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
-- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
