Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > >> >> I saw no discussion. Looking at the diff it would seem this change >> fixes a regression introduced during the NY sprint? (using >> layer and their names instead of resources and their qualified names?) > Right, I guess a chance to chime in would have been nice. Especially > since a better fix might just be to have LayerInfoImpl.getName() call > through to ResourceInfo.getPrefixedName() since we don't really allow > the two to differ, and this probably will probably come up again in > other places.
Yup, agreed it's a better way and one we discussed and agreed upon already. Soo... let's do it? Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
