Gabriel Roldan ha scritto: > Agreed. Note it also forces layer name to be read only for the time > being and to make the UI layer name validation check weaker (for > instance, ArcSDE type names have been non wfs conformant since 2003, > they contain periods, something that can be fixed as per the > resource/publish split when all the services use layer name, but right > now it simply means we couldn't add any ArcSDE feature type).
Imho we can have weaker name validation for the moment > Gabriel > > PS: whether to make ArcSDE type names WFS friendly as default may be a > separate discussion. GeoServer may also choose to escape names somehow > which in the end seems cleverer to me, as there's no real mandate on > geotools type names to be GML valid? Indeed Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
