It would be very nice to switch to ECQL ... also wondering if it's stable enough or not at this time.
------------------------------------------------------- Eng. Alessio Fabiani Founder / CTO GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 983027 fax: +39 0584 983027 mob: +39 349 8227000 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Andrea Aime <aa...@opengeo.org> wrote: > Hi, > ECQL has been around for a while and we failed to > use it in 2.0.x so far. > > I've checked, it seems all the changes required to > switch from CQL to ECQL in GeoServer boil down to > changing CQL -> ECQL in two files (see attached patch). > The assumption is, ECQL is a clean extension so there > is no need for the user to know that we actually > switched parsers, we can keep on having users hit > CQL_FILTER=.... (we just have to document the extra > capabilities starting from version x.y.z). > > The build after that change works fine. I would > certainly go for the switch on trunk, what about > 2.0.x as well? > > Wondering if ECQL has been tested enough for a stable > series. Is uDig using it already? > > Cheers > Andrea > > -- > Andrea Aime > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
