Makes sense. As I understand it CQL is a subset of ECQL correct? So nothing "protocol" wise has to change?
On 10-05-26 8:21 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > ECQL has been around for a while and we failed to > use it in 2.0.x so far. > > I've checked, it seems all the changes required to > switch from CQL to ECQL in GeoServer boil down to > changing CQL -> ECQL in two files (see attached patch). > The assumption is, ECQL is a clean extension so there > is no need for the user to know that we actually > switched parsers, we can keep on having users hit > CQL_FILTER=.... (we just have to document the extra > capabilities starting from version x.y.z). > > The build after that change works fine. I would > certainly go for the switch on trunk, what about > 2.0.x as well? > > Wondering if ECQL has been tested enough for a stable > series. Is uDig using it already? > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
