Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Makes sense. As I understand it CQL is a subset of ECQL correct? So > nothing "protocol" wise has to change?
That is my understanding as well. Here: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ECQL+Parser+Design Btw, as far as stability goes it seems ECQL has the same level of unit testing as CQL. Just not sure about real world testing. Mauricio, has ECQL been used in real world applications for a while? I sure don't see many changes in the EQL code in the last year, which might be a either sign of very good stability, or that not many people are using it ;-) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
