Mauricio Pazos ha scritto:
>> Pity that "ID" cannot be used, it would have been backwards compatible
>> (I think).
> Yes, it could be a problem, I am thinking in this cases to query by fid
> "ID" like "city.1"
> "ID" = 1
> ID in (...)
> I think it could be confuse
Yeah, I agree it could be a bit confusing... at the same time it would
not break uDig usage of ECQL. Jody? What is your preference, using " to
be able and use keywords as field names or moving to a custom sytanx
that cannot be mistaken for something else like:
id{id1, id2, ...}
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
