On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Andrea Aime <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Chris Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> Anyways, if I understand the document properly you also intend to add
> >>> support for SLD 1.1/SE 1.1 to GeoServer?
> >>
> >> It is not 100% yet if the funding is there but yes, at least a
> >> partial implementation. The first pass of this will mostly likely just
> be a
> >> parser / encoder for SE. That is the parts of SE that we are capable of
> >> implementing. See recent geotools thread.
> >>
> >
> > Our thought on this, which we're talking to our client about, is that
> it'd
> > be really worth it to be able to parse and encode SE 1.1 at the level of
> the
> > current renderer's capabilities, and then work through the particular
> > rendering improvements more slowly. So we'd have SLD 1.1 and SE 1.1 in a
> > release, but they'd have documented limitations (lack of geometry
> transforms
> > in pixel space, colorReplacement and InlineContent in external graphics,
> > line generalizations, etc). This gets us compatibility with any SE 1.1
> > document written that doesn't make use of those features. Our client may
> be
> > able to fund the most used ones, if not all, and we'd do that at a slower
> > pace.
>
> Sounds like a good plan to me.
> Wondering, many of our existing extensions are still not supported by SLD
> 1.:
> think most of the text symbolizer vendor options, or the open ended
> geometry
> transformations abilities, or the open ended mark and graphics factories
> with CQL expression replacements and so on: will these be maitained in
> the SE 1.1 parser?
>
>
Justin's doing the investigation, so we'll see what he says. I certainly
hope so, and indeed I'd prioritize those over the obscure SE requirements,
since those are actually real world tested. We may not be able to squeeze
them in for the next release, but would try to do them in the future.
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> Senior Software Engineer
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054 Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
>
> phone: +39 0584962313
> fax: +39 0584962313
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
> http://twitter.com/geowolf
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
