On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeol...@opengeo.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the steps to reproduce andrea. I should have time end of day
> today to look at this.
It seems the situation vs name and description is also broken on 2.0.x somehow
Making a request against the cite tests EntitéGenerique feature type
we get in the
output:
<sf:EntitéGénérique gml:id="EntitéGénérique.f004">
<gml:description>description-f004</gml:description>
<gml:name>name-f004</gml:name>
<gml:boundedBy>
<gml:Envelope srsDimension="2"
srsName="urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326">
<gml:lowerCorner>60.5 0.0</gml:lowerCorner>
<gml:upperCorner>64.0 6.25</gml:upperCorner>
</gml:Envelope>
</gml:boundedBy>
<sf:description>description-f004</sf:description>
<sf:name>name-f004</sf:name>
<sf:attribut.Géométrie>
<gml:Polygon srsDimension="2"
srsName="urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326">
<gml:exterior>
<gml:LinearRing>
<gml:posList>60.5 0.0 64.0 0.0 64.0 6.25 60.5 6.25 60.5
0.0</gml:posList>
</gml:LinearRing>
</gml:exterior>
<gml:interior>
<gml:LinearRing>
<gml:posList>61.5 2.0 62.5 2.0 62.0 4.0 61.5 2.0</gml:posList>
</gml:LinearRing>
</gml:interior>
</gml:Polygon>
</sf:attribut.Géométrie>
<sf:boolProperty>true</sf:boolProperty>
<sf:str4Property>abc3</sf:str4Property>
<sf:featureRef>name-f003</sf:featureRef>
</sf:EntitéGénérique>
See how name and description are reported both in the gml and sf namespaces,
the test complains it's not expecting sf:name and sf:description ...
However the describeFeatureType 1.1 reports:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml";
xmlns:it.geosolutions="http://www.geo-solutions.it";
xmlns:sf="http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf";
elementFormDefault="qualified"
targetNamespace="http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf";>
<xsd:import namespace="http://www.opengis.net/gml";
schemaLocation="http://localhost:8080/geoserver/schemas/gml/3.1.1/base/gml.xsd"/>
<xsd:complexType name="EntitéGénériqueType">
<xsd:complexContent>
<xsd:extension base="gml:AbstractFeatureType">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="0" name="description"
nillable="true" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="0" name="name"
nillable="true" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="0"
name="attribut.Géométrie" nillable="true"
type="gml:GeometryPropertyType"/>
<xsd:element maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="1" name="boolProperty"
nillable="false" type="xsd:boolean"/>
<xsd:element maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="1" name="str4Property"
nillable="false" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="0" name="featureRef"
nillable="true" type="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:extension>
</xsd:complexContent>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:element name="EntitéGénérique" substitutionGroup="gml:_Feature"
type="sf:EntitéGénériqueType"/>
</xsd:schema>
so in my understanding the above gml, even if odd, should be valid,
since name and description
were also declared in the sf namespace. However the cite test complains:
Messages from parser p:XMLValidatingParser.GMLSF1:
Validation error:
cvc-complex-type.2.4.a: Invalid content was found starting with
element 'sf:description'. One of
'{"http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf":attribut.Géométrie}' is
expected.
Validation error:
cvc-complex-type.2.4.a: Invalid content was found starting with
element 'sf:description'. One of
'{"http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf":attribut.Géométrie}' is
expected.
2 validation errors detected.
(the specific test is wfs:wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc29.4)
Ah btw, the WFS 1.0 tests did run fine, no failures there
Cheers
Andrea
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
