> "Death of kml" is of course exxagerated, but in fact I could only check that
> the patch attached to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4597 builds, I did
> not attempt to use any of the many KML output forms, options and whatnot.
Thanks for the insanely hard word on this Andrea, perhaps I should of said the
"slow bit rot of KML".
> The code coverage is not high and I'm confident we'll see some
> ClassCastException in some code path in KML when the code tries to use a
> layer as a vector layer (because it needs a feature source and a style) when
> the old code chewed raster layers the same way anyways
> (I tried to pay attention, but it's a maze in there, not sure what all the
> possible call paths are)
Andrea I have a patch that may attack the problem from the other end:
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3658
If I can ask for a review; the idea presented may not be great but I think it
may be a good compromise.
> So it would really need someone to check and fix. I'm not volunteering to be
> that person.
Agreed.
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
