> Jody is trying to scare up someone saying "stop it, I am the one maintaining
> it"
Perhaps not quite that mean; what I am trying to say is we have a patch
incoming that effects a lot of geoserver - and we have nobody
looking after KML. While you have done a great job to ensure it compiles and
passes it's tests I think asking for help or interested parties is a good idea.
> b) we apply the patch and say that it's ok if get KML somewhat broken bones
> out of it. Someone other than Andrea will care for it when the time comes
This is my preference, it comes with the concern that we won't hear about any
trouble until the next full release of GeoServer (where a broader range of
users try it out on their dataset).
> Maybe things will change, if any business interest in KML pops back up I'll
> be happy
> to help. As I said, I'm just not available to do KML work Saturday and
> Sunday, if it's
> work time it's welcomed.
With respect to (d) it is nice of gabriel to offer to help package it up; it
strikes me as a good move for the code irrespective of this patch. I think as
the PSC we can only keep the code compiling in the face of change and passing
its tests; we should not overstep our abilities in "taking responsibility".
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
