Speaking of going stale; is their any exposure in GeoServer to the ResourceId
change that I expect to sort out on Monday on the GeoTools side? Or is just
updating the bindings going to be enough ...
--
Jody Garnett
On Sunday, 23 October 2011 at 3:18 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The WFS 2.0 proposal has been sitting for over a week now. I would like to
> push this forward by calling for a vote if there is no more feedback. Or
> gather more feedback / patch review in order to drive it closer to a vote.
> Thanks, I realize it is a very large amount to review but at the same time I
> fear if we leave it sitting for too long the work will grow stale and further
> from being committed.
>
> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+61+-+WFS+2.0
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> Justin Deoliveira
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
> demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
> Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn
> about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> (mailto:[email protected])
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn
about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
