Thanks, Justin.

I think I answered my version question by reading the last paragraph of 
GSIP 61, in which you point out that GeoServer follows OGC policy and 
will default to WFS 2.0. Most of the app-schema tests are very specific 
to particular schemas and will be left on WFS 1.1 / GML 3.1 with a 
&version=1.1.0 option.

The FeatureTypeSchemaBuilder fix was to remove an unwarratned assumption 
by treating includes the same as imports until the moment they are added 
to the schema (i.e. the same duplicate removal logic). Once that is 
done, it is all good.

I am just running a final full build of wfs2_merged.patch plus my fixes 
then I will attach a patch to the WFS 2.0 page:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4511

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 25/10/11 14:13, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for the input... but I wonder about other clients that do parse 
> describe feature type... one would hope that people don't rely on the 
> structure but you never know. I guess we can wait and see.
>
> Regarding adding of the version=1.1.0 parameter... simply put most existing 
> test cases (in and out of app-schema) were not written to work  with wfs 2.0 
> / gml 3.2 so rather than work on porting all tests to wfs 2.0 I simply added 
> the version 1.1.0. Although many did seem ok with wfs 2.0 output so i left 
> those be.
>
> I fear that if i had to instead rewrite all existing tests to work with wfs 
> 2.0 output that well... we would never see wfs 2.0 land on trunk :)

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn 
about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to