On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Reading more carefully; they know you have been taking part in the cite
> email lists for the last month.
>
> We probably do have to go through some song and dance to be a recognised
> reference implementation. With that in mind I would like to:
> a) let cameron look into the details; until our next meeting; to see what
> he can figure out
> b) sort out how to particpate in the next meeting (either give the nod to
> Cameron to proceed, or make our own plans if he is not interested)
>
Ok with (a). For (b) I was already planning to do an official test run as
this is really a community concern orthogonal to any of the ows cite
initiatives.
>
> Is it still the case that we have to pay to get CITE compliance? Or does
> your current participation cover let you run against the official version
> of the tests.
>
Not sure, good question. I guess I will find out soon enough.
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 11:37 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
> Interesting. Indeed i was contacted today about the status of geoserver
> cite and explained that indeed we pass the latest cite test hot from their
> svn trunk which now includes all the patches i submitted. It sounds like
> this week or next they are going to update the official online engine
> hosted by the OGC at which time i will set up a server and run an official
> version of the tests, at which time i hope we can officially call geoserver
> cite compliant.
>
> As for reference implementations, my understanding is that the policy has
> always been to have multiple reference implementations and that they don't
> actually finalize things until they have three of them. Anyways, it will be
> great for geoserver to be a reference implementation of wms 1.3. Get to add
> another ri to the list :)
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jody <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With respect to OGC wms reference implementation the OGC indicated that
> they are already in contact with Justin. Looks like they are changing to
> having more than one reference implementation and are aware geoserver
> passes CITE.
>
> --
> Jody
> Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
>
> On Tuesday, 10 July 2012 at 2:11 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
> GeoTools and GeoServer meeting July 9 2012
>
> Participants
> ---------------
>
> Jody
> Andrea
> Justin
> Alessio
> Ben
>
> Agenda
> -------------
>
> * git switchover
> * 2.2-RC1 release (status)
> * 2.2-RC2 release
> * Reference WMS 1.3.0 Implementation
> * shapefile-ng store
> * PSC refresh
>
>
> Git switchover
> ------------------
>
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/3
>
> Git switch complete.
> Artifacts popping up, build server and cite tests
>
> Issues finding the checkout/clone documentation
>
> Pull requests are not getting notified. Workflow:
> * create jira (to be noticed)
> * pull request on github
>
> Action items:
> * someone should reshuffle the dev docs so that the
> the checkout/clone docs are easier to find (Jody?)
> * Justin looking into ways to get notified anyways
>
>
> 2.2-RC1
> -------------------
>
> Moving on today, feedback from people?
> Victor tried it out, thumbs up, go ahead today,
> and then Victor does blog and announcement
>
> 2.2-RC2
> ------------------
>
> Victor to be doing next one in two weeks from
> today and ask the community to test it, test it, test it
>
> Action Items:
> - Victor does the release
>
> Reference WMS 1.3.0 implementation
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Wait for details from Cameron. OGC notification indicates August 5
> deadline for participation.
>
> Action Items:
> - Jody will see what is going on and report back
>
> Shapefile DataStore NG
> -----------------------------------
>
> * how to proceed?
> * lacks a dbtype unfortunately
> * if the old factory is there disable it?
> * just kick out the old and go with the new one and see how it goes for
> six months,
> by replacing all old references to that
>
> Cruft
> ------
> - postgis-versioned getools / wfs-v
>
>
> PSC refresh
> -------------
>
> - Retired members: Rob Atkinson
> - Call for new volunteers
> - Consult list on PSC rule changes, update guidelines for PSC status
>
> Action:
> - email devel list with a reminder (voting requirement and two months
> meeting gap) (Ben)
> - refresh the PSC list after the next meeting (ie the two month line): Jody
> - review this section of the developers guide and update to reflect what
> we actually are doing: (Justin)
>
> - Apologies in advance from Andrea for next meeting.
>
>
> --
> Justin Deoliveira
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> geotools-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Justin Deoliveira
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
>
>
>
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
