+1. Attending meetings is great if you can, but reviewing and voting on proposals in both necessary and sufficient to be on the PSC.
I was thinking of people with family obligations when I wrote: "It is not mandatory to attend meetings, but it is mandatory to be active; those who have other commitments and cannot attend meetings are welcome to participate through email, voting on GSIPs, and similar activities." I would like the PSC to be as broad as possible, as long as everyone on it is active. Kind regards, Ben. On 11/07/12 23:44, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > I am not sure about putting such an emphasis on the meetings as required > to show the necessary participation to be part of the PSC. Given we are > radically spread out across the globe it is not just doable for a lot of > people, but that doesn't mean they aren't active. > > To me the biggest thing in the evaluation of activity should be proposal > voting taking the time to review proposals. Even if someone attended > every meeting but generally never provides any feedback or votes for a > proposal I would think they should still consider stepping down. > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
