On 23-01-15 14:21, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote:The proposal has now been changed. Please re-read it and place your comments!And oh, also, I'd say it's important to clarify that a potentially common request, to apply service specific rules on a per workspace basis, is going to be impossible,because they would break the hierarchical approach: topp.*.wms.*.r=* topp.*.wfs.*.r=ROLE1
Hmm it appears now that this is actually a requirement. Would you object if I lay out a proposal of how we could implement it with minimal change to the current hierarchical implementation?
Regards Niels
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
