Hi,
You wrote:
"I'm using a cascading WMS (from another Geoserver) to put a map behind
our GPS station locations and I had to switch all the coordinates to make
the projections overlay correctly."
Could you explain why do you think that WKT definition is the reason for
your trouble with cascading WMS and what coordinates you need to switch?
Cascading WMS is usually painless if user remembers that for WMS versions
prior 1.3 the BBOX is expressed always in longitude-latitude /
easting-northing order for all the projections. In WMS 1.3 the official
axis order is to be honoured. Could it be that you are cascading WMS 1.1.x
and you make a wrong assumption that BBOX should be in lat-lon order? If
that is the case, simply start cascading WMS 1.3.0.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
------------------------------
*Lähettäjä:* Gavin Medley <med...@unavco.org>
*Lähetetty:* 1. elokuuta 2017 20:15
*Vastaanottaja:* geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
*Aihe:* [Geoserver-users] EPSG:4326 Incorrect WKT - Coordinates
Reversed!
Hi all,
I believe that the WKT for EPGS:4326 in Geoserver is incorrect. Can
someone verify?
Note the lat lon coordinate order in the following strings. Geoserver
displays:
GEOGCS["WGS 84",
DATUM["World Geodetic System 1984",
SPHEROID["WGS 84", 6378137.0, 298.257223563, AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","6326"]],
PRIMEM["Greenwich", 0.0, AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
UNIT["degree", 0.017453292519943295],
AXIS["Geodetic longitude", EAST],
AXIS["Geodetic latitude", NORTH],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","4326"]]
However, epsg-registry.org lists the official WKT as:
GEODCRS["WGS 84",
DATUM["World Geodetic System 1984",
ELLIPSOID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563,LENGTHUNIT["metre",1.0]]],
CS[ellipsoidal,2],
AXIS["latitude",north,ORDER[1]],
AXIS["longitude",east,ORDER[2]],
ANGLEUNIT["degree",0.01745329252],
ID["EPSG",4326]]
According to EPSG, latitude is FIRST. I'm using a cascading WMS (from
another Geoserver) to put a map behind our GPS station locations and I had
to switch all the coordinates to make the projections overlay correctly.
-Gavin
--
Gavin Medley
Software Engineer I
*UNAVCO*
6350 Nautilus Drive
Boulder, CO 80301-5394
med...@unavco.org
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it>
To: Gavin Medley <med...@unavco.org>
Cc: Ian Turton <ijtur...@gmail.com>, geoserver-users <
geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Bcc:
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 22:49:11 +0200
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] EPSG:4326 Incorrect WKT - Coordinates
Reversed!
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Gavin Medley <med...@unavco.org> wrote:
Hi,
I'm using 1.1.0. Shouldn't the axis order be defined by the EPSG
official WKT string? Am I correct in thinking that order[1] and order[2]
specify the coordinate order?
OGC took its dear time to make things clear on this, WFS 1.1 happened
midway when the axis order storm blew up (and I'm
partially to blame cause I raised exactly your question, shouldn't WGS84
be in lat/lon order?).
When that happened everybody on the user side quietly assumed a "sane"
"east/north" order for everything, in GeoServer we tried to
keep both parties happy by adopting the following policy
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wfs/basics
.html#axis-ordering
Basically, legacy naming, east/north, new naming, EPSG database
suggested order instead.
Deegree seems to have followed suit, https://github.com/deegr
ee/deegree3/wiki/Axis-order-handling
There is currently no way to get EPSG suggested axis order with the old
EPSG:XYWZ syntax, nor any plan to add one
(but with funding or contribution, that might still happen, as a
configuration flag for those that want to impose strict behavior).
Mind, the axis order issue is far from being solved, even today and with
the latest OGC specs:
- Some outputs only work and make sense in east/north order, and the
spec allows no official way to get them (e.g, shapefile, but also, geojson
and, hear hear, geopackage, and by spec too, see
https://github.com/opengeospatial/geopackage/issues/54
<https://github.com/opengeospatial/geopackage/issues/54>)
- I'm constantly asked by customers how the heck one can get
east/north data out of the latest specs (thankfully we have a way)
- Large installations on big companies guide their users to force a
lon/lat order, see for example https://dgcsportal.rea
dme.io/docs/web-feature-service
<https://dgcsportal.readme.io/docs/web-feature-service>
- Some epic blog posts raised the issue among disgruntled people:
http://dmorissette.blogspot.it/2012/12/dont-upgrade-
to-wms-130-unless-you.html
<http://dmorissette.blogspot.it/2012/12/dont-upgrade-to-wms-130-unless-you.html>
Long story short, in these conditions, it's best not to take sides and
allow both desired behaviors (in the two different camps) to happen.
If you're in the "pure OGC" camp feel free to contribute an extra
configuration flag to get your GeoServer installation to force EPSG order
no matter what the syntax is, it will be welcomed (by some, at least :-p ).
See a guide to get new features in here: https://github.com/geose
rver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-
new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer
Hopefully one day OGC will wake up and realize that depending on the
context and background both axis orders make sense/are needed, and will
create a syntax allowing to advertise the order without assuming a local,
or network accessible copy of the EPSG database, and an official way to ask
the data in the preferred order.
Hope this helps
Regards,
Andrea Aime
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054 Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313 <+39%200584%20962313>
fax: +39 0584 1660272 <+39%200584%20166%200272>
mob: +39 339 8844549 <+39%20339%20884%204549>
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely
for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential
or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to
this list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
