Best yes. I think that INCLUDE_ALL is like NONE (or that that ALL?) in being suitable for misinterpretation. (Include everything in the filter? Include everything in the return set?)
Your version references something external (I must be "get"ing something) and helps clarify what your other words are about... P On 6-Nov-06, at 1:15 PM, Matthias Basler wrote: > Justin wrote: >>> A couple points to note: >>> 1 Names chosen to describe (and try and avoid double negative >>> when used >>> in a query) >>> - Filter.INCLUDE >>> - Filter.EXCLUDE >> These don't strike me as particularily expressive either, how about >> - Filter.INCLUDE_ALL >> - Filter.EXCLUDE_ALL > > Definitely more intuitive. But now that everybody makes > suggestions ... my personal favourites: > - Filter.GET_EVERYTHING > - Filter.GET_NOTHING > > ;-) > -- > Matthias Basler > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your > job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? > cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
