If Paul is right, and I do like his analysis, why doesn't the shorter GET_ALL and GET_NONE work just as well?
--adrian On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 13:54 -0800, Jody Garnett wrote: > I can go for that, my test is always the confusion test (can we read the > code and figure out what it will do). > > Comparing: > - new Query( "roads", Filter.GET_EVERYTHING ) > - new Query( "roads", Filter.INCLUDE ) > > Yours *is* more clear :-D So is there anyway I can get this down to a > single word? > > Cheers, > Jody > > Matthias Basler wrote: > > Definitely more intuitive. But now that everybody makes suggestions ... my > > personal favourites: > > - Filter.GET_EVERYTHING > > - Filter.GET_NOTHING > > > > ;-) > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
