Jody Garnett wrote: >Martin if the developers guide says 1.1.3 (and we send out an email) you >can make that assumption... > >I tried updating the developers guide in Monday's meeting - can you >review the page and send out >an email if you are happy? > > Ah, so someone using 1.1.3 has managed to get the tests to pass? A couple months ago I upgraded to 1.1.3, watched the uDig reprojection code die, and quickly reverted (it seemed that some important classes had been removed). So 1.1.3 actually works :)? (I kept getting the no "mediaLib accelerator wrapper classes" exceptions, just like the guy on geotools-users with the "Another JAI question" post).
Thanks, Cory. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
