Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Justin Deoliveira wrote: >>> >>>>> up to 1 MB. Merging them into main concerns me quite a bit. >>>> Agreeed; it would be merged into "xml" (possible with child modules >>>> if I understand Justin), main is big enough already (are you going >>>> to write up a proposal for changing what code goes where? You >>>> started an email discussion two weeks ago ...) >>>> >>> I started email and brought it up in IRC but you and Andrea both >>> vetoed it so i didn't go forth with a proposal. >> I am not sure Andrea or I had a good idea; and the problem has not >> gone away for you (and Andrea still does not like the large download >> size). >> I would *like* to keep the number of artifacts down (so end users do >> no go insane). I know maven makes tracking the things "easier" ... > Oh well, -0 to put all the xml modules inside a parent module, instead > of -1. > I think we're down to the road of deep paths damnation, but lets > experience disprove me :-) Andrea we are in close agreement; we both don't want to see a huge dependency - and would like something more fine grained. I do not want to see many little jars - especially when some of the specifications slot together.
xml compatibility pack 1: - filter1_0, gml2, jts xml compatibility pack 2: - filter1_1, gml3, geometry.wkt Would you consider that kind of thing sane? Jody > Cheers > Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
