On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Jody Garnett wrote: > How do you guys feel about making a language that is a bit more lax? Now > that we have the starting point? That is possible, I suggest to maintain different dialects that reuse the existent software infrastructure. The dialects would allow: 1 - to associate the context which the specific language must be used 2- to redefine the original rules without conflict. 3- to reuse the "builders" for semantic actions
> > I am thinking specifically of making one that has: > a) support for filters that match what geotools can do: > CQL: propertName contains geometry > TXT: geometry contains propertyName > b) some kind of fid filter > CQL: n/q > TXT: #road.1 > > Did you guys ever review my port of Eclesia's CQL encoder? No I didn't, where is it? > It is > committed with test cases... it generates the TXT format mentioned above > (so it is not always valid CQL) > Jody -- Mauricio Pazos www.axios.es tel-:+34 94 441 63 84 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
