For the record, just tried to build geotools with Junit 4.4 and it went just 
well, meaning its seems to actually be backwards compatible.
So if its a matter of upgrading the junit dependency, as it means by no reason 
needing to upgrade the tests, I'd like to do that.

2 cnts.

Gabriel


On Monday 28 January 2008 03:49:52 pm Gabriel Roldán wrote:
> That's indeed very cool Andrea.
> I've to say, to support Andrea's proposal, that I've been using
> junit4+EasyMock for some time now on another project and its going
> perfectly, and indeed provides for a true way of isolating unit tests, and
> helps design testable code, etc.
> Yet, I don't quite understand why EasyMock wouldn't be able to mock up
> interfaces if using Junit 3, they seem unrelated to me, yet never tried to
> use easymock with Junit 3.
> Though I know by this time Andrea sent an email to the author to confirm.
>
> Gabriel
>
> On Monday 28 January 2008 03:32:51 pm Andrea Aime wrote:
> > Hi,
> > today I tried to fix a bug (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1693)
> > that required fixing DefaultFeatureResults and co. The issue with this
> > bug is that one cannot unit test DefaultFeatureResults without
> > creating a ton or related classes... unless mock testing is used.
> >
> > So I gave a spin at EasyMock 2 and... wow! Look at how simple the
> > test with the mock object is:
> >
> > public void testMaxFeatureOptimized() throws Exception {
> >      DefaultQuery q = new DefaultQuery("roads");
> >      q.setMaxFeatures(10);
> >
> >      // mock up the feature source so that it'll return a count of 20
> >      SimpleFeatureType type = DataUtilities.createType("roads",
> > "_=the_geom:Point,FID:String,NAME:String");
> >      FeatureSource fs = createMock(FeatureSource.class);
> >      expect(fs.getSchema()).andReturn(type).anyTimes();
> >      expect(fs.getCount(q)).andReturn(20);
> >      replay(fs);
> >
> >      DefaultFeatureResults results = new DefaultFeatureResults(fs, q);
> >      assertEquals(10, results.size());
> > }
> >
> > Basically I create a mock, set a few expectations on the method
> > calls and their return values, and I'm in business. Lovely.
> >
> > Unfortunately this did not last long. I had to make a similar
> > fix in JDBCFeatureCollection, which needs JDBCFeatureSource,
> > which in turn is not an interface. And EasyMock + JUnit 3
> > does not allow to mock interfaces... Junit4 is required to
> > do so.
> >
> > I looked around, JMock is there, but imho setting up
> > the mock objects is quite a bit more convoluted.
> > JUnit4 is apparently supported by both Eclipse and Maven,
> > yet I'm a little reluctant upgrading due to the extensive
> > amount of tests made using JUnit 3... we have no complaints
> > on it and we have a good expertise grown on it...
> >
> > Soo... what do people think? Opinions?
> > Cheers
> > Andrea
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geotools-devel mailing list
> > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
> !DSPAM:4045,479deba3164881030819293!



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to