Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > So what is the consensus on backwards compatibility? I have heard > statements saying it is completely 100% backwards compatible, and others > saying it requires a different package? > > Either way I am probably +1, just want to be clear.
Both statements are correct. Apparently JUnit4 annotations and new stuff are in a different package, but the old JUnit 3 is still in the same jar using the old package names, that's why it's backwards compatible. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
