So what is the consensus on backwards compatibility? I have heard statements saying it is completely 100% backwards compatible, and others saying it requires a different package?
Either way I am probably +1, just want to be clear. Mauricio Pazos wrote: > On Monday 28 January 2008, Simone Giannecchini wrote: >>> I'm +1 for upgrating to JUnit 4 at least on trunk (I'm indifferent for >>> 2.4 branch). >>> >>> Martin > > +1 for trunk too > > regards > -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project http://topp.openplans.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
