Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> So we have the same approach; my question is how can we avoid >> spending months defining a minimal set? > Easy, take the plan of "only use that which applies to all datastores" > and validate it against the only *concrete* use case we have which is > johanns widget stuff. If the minimal set we come up works for him then > we are done. Anything that we think we might need in the future can go > in a subclass for that particular implementor to worry about. > We also have uDig as a different widget set; however we can be flexible on what is needed (seriously I just want it to make sense ... ). Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
