On Thursday 07 February 2008 03:35:11 pm Justin Deoliveira wrote: > > I see your point, we're on the same boat here. Ie just the place where > > our proposals join? > > So are you comfortable with org.geoapi.feature.FeatureCollection for the > > general case and org.geotools.feature.FeatureCollection for the simple > > feature case? > > once you're proposal goes ahead you can just make geotools > > FeatureCollection NOT extending Collection nor SimpleFeature and being > > just the > > SimpleFeature/Type specialization of geoapi FeatureCollection? > > Yup, this sounds good to me. Has geoapi FC been locked down yet? I just > ask because it seems that geoapi 2.1 is going to be released soon. I > would like to avoid being tied to an interface that we may want to tweak > a bit. Cool. In my understanding noone uses it as it is for geoapi 2.1. GeoTools trunk is on 2.2-SNAPSHOT so my guess is we should have some room to tweak it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
