Hi Justin, On Thursday 07 February 2008 03:11:56 pm Justin Deoliveira wrote: > I just thought i would chime in again with my thoughts on7 > FeatureCollection. I am indifferent to having a new FeatureCollection > interface. My main concern is with the implementation of > FeatureCollection. As long as it is implemented *once*, and in terms of > FeatureSource i am happy. I see your point, we're on the same boat here. Ie just the place where our proposals join? So are you comfortable with org.geoapi.feature.FeatureCollection for the general case and org.geotools.feature.FeatureCollection for the simple feature case? once you're proposal goes ahead you can just make geotools FeatureCollection NOT extending Collection nor SimpleFeature and being just the SimpleFeature/Type specialization of geoapi FeatureCollection?
Gabriel. > > Past that we can wrap it up in any interface we want. However, do we > really want to make more changes then we need to? I mean... the current > interface does work, its just really hard to implement. Adding the > missing methods to FeatureSource/DataStore remove the burden of having > to implement it. So I would also be ok with just leaving the interface > as is making it one less thing that users have to worry about. > > -Justin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
